Re: The J.A.R.V.I.S AutoReply Protocol Initiative (JARPI)

I guess now I'm going to be using JARPI as an AI-buster:

Look, I think this idea is better than answering questions!

But, based on the automatic text, I had a doubt:
Do you first manually validate the AI's suspicion and then post, or does it post automatically?
Or are you the one who suspects a topic, and puts the JARPI to analyze which then makes the post in case of a positive result?

Third option is correct. I ran OP's text through many AI detectors and all of them gave AI-generated indicators, so I fired up JARPI to send the warning.

Are you going to manually look for suspected AI posts, do manual scanning, and check whether or not it's AI created before triggering JARPI to act? I thought JARPI was meant to be a bot conducting this errand for you rather than you running the errand? What's the point if there's still a bunch of shitwork for you to do?