In life you have to be rich of something, or nobody want to marry to you, and have build a family with you, you would be foreveralone, and the media would constantly mogging you over and over again for being foreveralone to remain you. And your mum would constantly tell you if you don't get married nobody would take care of you when your aged. Nobody would make a tomb for you, and when you died you would go to afterlife with empty stomach and would suffer straving too in the afterlife. That must be a lot of hurt! ouch!
So back to question. which is preferred? Married to fiat rich or crypto rich? Although crypto can be created at the comfort of your basement, also the value would plummet quickly to near zero too. Do you think in your life, you would ever see someone marry to crypto rich? btw recent news about ftx being rejected to sponsor a superstar due to it is unregistered tell me marry crypto rich might be a distance dream. Also there would be only 21m bitcoin existed, only 21m couples would be able to married rich. When there is billions of population, a lot of couples may not marry rich, due to unequal distribution, some of the crypto super rich would married hundreds of thousand more.
I strongly disagree with the idea that being rich in material possessions or currency is a requirement for finding love and building a family. While financial stability can certainly be important in a relationship, it is not the only factor that determines whether or not someone is a good partner or spouse.
Furthermore, the idea that someone would be "foreveralone" or suffer in the afterlife because they are not financially wealthy is not only untrue, but also harmful and perpetuates harmful societal norms and expectations.
As for the question of whether it is better to marry someone who is fiat rich or crypto rich, I believe that financial wealth should not be the sole determining factor in a relationship. It is important to consider other factors such as compatibility, shared values, and mutual respect and support.