No. Tagging someone with zero scam history is not necessarily an abuse of the trust system. The system is designed to help identify and address potential issues before they become bigger problems. Even if someone has no history of scams, they may still engage in behavior that violates forum rules or causes other users to feel he/she is untrustworthy.
When you want to see problems then you will always see problems. What makes you think that there is going to be a problem or something is becoming bigger problem. Are you a person from the future and landed into our timezone using your invented time machine?
Here what I see problem when I look at your profile.
One of the best scam buster on the forum.
@FatFork: scamer hunter, guard forum & community from criminality.
Great forum contribution
Knows how to perfectly expose cheaters on the forum. I believe him. Continue. My respect.
Great scam buster; keeping the forum clean is his daily job..I respect you. Keep up Fatfork
FatFork is positively helping with exposing scams. Thank you for your contributions tidying up this forum.
What do I get from all these positive feedback?
I can see you have a greater goal to build the account and then you will scam someone. You have no trading history but someone may feel safe looking at all these positive feedback then try to have a large deal. You will take the chance and gone, no one finds you. A scam accusation is the best and these same group of people will then tag you. Should I tag you before the problem become bigger?
I can see you are building your account and aligned with a group of people who have the same interest too and exchanging positive feedback to each others to build your accounts. Should I see a problem here and tag you? Problem can be bigger, right?
On the other hand I can see, it's okay, when someone is trying to build their account. It looks odd when an account received 6 positive feedback from a group of people [in just 4 years of timestamp, obviously after the merit system introduced] but none of them are trade related where feedback was supposed to be encouraging trades between users.
What difference you and the other account have which was accused for an alt [you think they could scam, they are problem and so many negative things]?