.
... . There's soo much discussion we've been trying to talk or discuss on when it comes to art contest on which neither application of AI or not then its up to the team because its their contest after all,
which means that they do have the full right on what are the rules and terms that on this certain competition. It is really just that normal that there would really be tools
which could be used to fasten up the process and make it more that looks good of course.
As I understand it, in any competition where people give marks, whether it be a professional jury, or just inexperienced people, there is always some part of people who are dissatisfied with the result.
And accordingly the choice of the winner or several winners. In sports such as figure skating, gymnastics or synchronized swimming, there are always more dissatisfied people than, for example, in running or shooting competitions. Where the result is obvious to everyone. It seems to me that in evaluating works of art, an honest jury should of course make sure that the group of dissatisfied people is much, much smaller than those who agree with the jury's conclusions.
This is how I understand the process of objective and honest evaluation of art competitions.