Are you saying if your address list contains close to 2^32 addresses, a bug may exist, as you described above?
Yes the bug exists, but the behaivor of it is unexpected
if you see this PoC:
https://github.com/jvirkki/libbloom/issues/20Items 4194304 bloom filter bytes 7537997
Items 8388608 bloom filter bytes 15075994
Items 16777216 bloom filter bytes 30151987
Items 33554432 bloom filter bytes 60303973
Items 67108864 bloom filter bytes 120607946
Items 134217728 bloom filter bytes 241215893
Items 268435456 bloom filter bytes 482431785
Items 536870912 bloom filter bytes 427992657
Items 1073741824 bloom filter bytes 319114402
Items 2147483648 bloom filter bytes 101357891
Why more items in the bloom lead to a lower number of bytes? Look carefully:
Items
268435456 bloom filter bytes
482431785Items
536870912 bloom filter bytes
427992657Items
1073741824 bloom filter bytes
319114402Items
2147483648 bloom filter bytes
101357891That’s a large number of addresses!
Yes it is, I've seeing people making such amount of list with keysubtract or similar custom tools
I’ve ran it with 2^28 addresses and found the key I had put in there as a POW address.
The bug is only present above a 2^30 list and the hebaivor is unexpected it may hit or not but it need to be tested.