Why would that be more fair? What matters is what 1 unit of currency can buy. That is not determined by how many units could be printed, not even by how many exist, but by how many are in circulation, and the demand for them.
Speaking of demand, I recall someone claiming that the bulk of bitcoin "commerce" (excluding investment and speculation), right now, is internet gambling. Is that true?
Inflation you can trust has value. The
QE monetary inflation that just locks in previous inflation in asset prices (asset not tracked in the CPI and monetary inflation studies) paints a different picture. Still this inflation is expected to remain lower that Bitcoin until Q3 2016). But ultimately the price deflation in Bitcoin is not a result of economic growth, but reflects the trust in a predictable monetary inflation policy, where asset prices are not manipulated by the central banks, the volatility arguably reflects greed and fear.