Researching casinos without regular incentives is uncommon, and betting on these online casino games without bonuses is an absolute no-no. As consequently, bonuses encouraged players to put in more effort when playing casino games, checking out the odds that makes the double fold of the capital invested. Adding to the list mentioned, if something goes wrong and it is not disclosed in the thread, the OP will hold you liable because you are the one who recommended a gambling site with bonuses. Casino with wagering requirements are plenty, all you have to do is to follow the mentioned ones already and sort out the alternatives.
I'd agree, now that most of the top casinos are offering so many rewards, gamblers would prefer to play in casinos that have the same characteristics. There's nothing wrong about gamblers playing without bonuses because not all gamblers are mainly gambling for the bonuses and not all deposit bonuses are worth risking as sometimes it can even hold you back if you're not careful. Anyway, I don't see the need to blame OP as much when he's doing his best to increase the visibility of these requirements since it's a hassle to go through the casinos one by one.
I avoid gambling bonuses as much as I could as the conditions of usage before the money could be withdrawn are always not palatable. This makes me wager my money and I do this with good plans and don't have issues like many would be complaining about with casinos.
Also, it will be ill of anyone to blame the OP, to me, the guy is creative to have thought towards that angle, and things like this are common on the internet to help people easily select their choice. And any company that deems exposed should then adjust its terms and conditions if need be.