Off the top of my head, I recognize two possible solutions in order to resolve the matter with ONLY one knife stroke..


Hm?

Don't you gots ur lil selfie a lots of cornz by now?

By the way, I will admit that in some sense, I can relate to what you are describing, especially since sometimes, I will create tokenly small orders, just for funzies, and I will get a wee bit worked up regarding whether and/or how such order(s) fill.. and whether there was a lot of good/bad luck involved in the way that BTC prices ended up moving, even though in the whole scheme of things, the order(s) hardly even affected my "stack" in any kind of significant or meaningful way.


I am pretty sure that forum admins will not tend to consider images as plagiarism - even when no source has been provided - of course, when there is substantive written content contained within the image, then it might come off a bit more ambiguous regarding who was the creator of the idea(s) and whether proper sources had been cited.. . but still I doubt that forum admins are going to presume that the poster (even if a newbie merit farmer) is misleading other members regarding who created the image (even with written content contained therein).. ... 

Personally, I do consider that it is probably a better practice to cite some of the sources, especially when there are words on the pictures, or at least to disclaim having had made the image.. I do not make any of my images, and I post images all of the time and I rarely (if ever) provide any source for my images, which I tend to just get by doing a google search that relates to some funny (or not funny) point that I might want to make and I find some random image that seems to represent my point... never created by me and hardly ever sourced.... yet I do not tend to cite images that have written content contained therein, so personally it seems to me that having written content on the image might be a bit more necessity to cite the source.. or where it was found (came from).