By the way, I found an interesting claim on their website. So much about being non profit media.
I am really looking forward to hear what he can say in his defense.
This is getting interesting the disclaimer is for readers to make the readers believe that they are independent and transparent and they are not doing paid reviews but based on the screenshots provided by OP
They just betrayed themselves, they have to go here to defend themselves or they will get tagged and their platform exposed for extortion.
This has the malpractice of many ICO reviewers, they are not going to just help projects, there's always money involved.