I saw some of the older AntiDolos reviews and I suspected that he is a shitty and lazy scambuster (I even warned him few months ago that he has to provide some proof for his claims) but it look like his main goal is not to protect ignorant investors but to actually profit from this by offering higher rating for money.
I see that he did something similar in the past with the Ideaology project in this thread:
Is Ideaology.io scam or a great opportunity? [
archive]
First, he published a very negative review claiming that the project was too risky and worthless, with an amateur and inexperienced team.
However, after just under a month, he completely changed his story and deleted (or denied) almost all of his claims from the original review, ultimately giving the project a high 8.5/10 rating. Now, I don't know if the owners of the Ideaology project paid for a positive review, and that will be hard to prove unless they publicly admit it themselves, but realistically, what could cause such a drastic change of opinion in such a short time? If you're going to write reviews, at least try to be objective and free of personal biases so you don't have to contradict your own words.
Ideaology (IDEA) IEO, Risky but Profitable! (Updated Dec 22, 2020)
And, according to the date stated, that update was made only a week after Amar Kovacevic from Ideaology
publicly accused them of abuse and blackmail.