Looks good to me. Hopefully will encourage more adoption of Lightning network or other layer 2 solutions with increasing cost of mainnet transactions.
Quote
Reality is that Bitcoin is a free market. As long as someone is willing to pay the satoshis for a transaction, they are as entitled as everyone else to it. Spam or not.
some types of spam need to be controlled though. which is why they were never allowed in the first place.Quote
Actually the opposite is true. Doing nothing is in line with the consensus created over a decade ago, whether you like it or not.
have a little compassion. he wants to use bitcoin to send money. and not be price gouged over fees. isn't that what bitcoin was meant for? i guess not, if we go by your point of view.Quote
You mean like censor transactions? That sounds like a centralised solution to me.
i think it's fair to expect only financial banking transactions to be on the bitcoin blockchain. censorship or not. if you don't have censorship to some degree then guess what you have? anarchy. i've heard so many complaints about LN that i stopped trying to look into what it is or what exactly it does. so please lets not discuss LN as a solution to high fees.
