Misinformation is something that can make someone fail to understand something properly. In fact they should not only be advised to read, but they should also do so from a trusted source that does not attach importance to the author's personal sentiments or opinions. Of course in the end the right information is only found on real sites like bitcoin.org or elsewhere on github, and here they have to filter it.
I'm honestly not a good teacher for anyone with an interest in bitcoin, but if they want to learn about bitcoin then I'd be inclined to recommend a few sites that can help them get the right information. But I can equip them with basic knowledge about bitcoin as a first step to respond to their interest.
Everyone also has to filter and study the information they get themselves, not the other way around immediately receiving and running references to handles. The bitcoin.org and github sites are the most credible sites at the moment, but they also need to be looked at, so that the information can be applied according to the needs of the reader. It's difficult to convince people to respond positively to bitcoin, unless they have basic knowledge and previous experience with bitcoin.
Until now I have not been able to convince people around me to invest, even though they often interact and often have discussions every day, so I decided not to become a bitcoin guru for other people. When they have basic knowledge it will be easy for them to respond and receive information from us, this is the reason that keeps me from trying to convince others when they are not ready to accept bitcoin as an investment.