so you admit chipmixer broke the law.. which you think there are no laws ..
Since it's illegal in both Germany and US to run an unlicensed money transmitter service, and ChipMixer was running in just about both countries, it's pretty much certain that it did break the law.
I have nowhere stated that there are no laws that prohibit such activity. I have merely argued there is no law that prohibits mixing, which is true as far as I'm concerned. In no court have I ever seen mixing being equated to some unlicensed money transmitting service's product. You can practically mix coins yourself, with absolutely no other users, even though it's not recommended for your privacy. But it is, and can obfuscate in an extent. Coinjoining is neither money transmitting.
mixing with no other users is not mixing.. because your coins are yours so its all the same junk.. heck even you know this when your sober.. .. thats the whole point of you wanting to recruit innocent people. so that you can get rid of your dirty coins onto such innocents to take their clean coins. because thats how it works.
..
when you do wire transfer to some stranger. your bank knows who that went to so their bank could ask that person for more details about the purpose of that receipt and get your address they sent coins to.
if all of your coins have information that links to you where you are at the end points doing wire transfer in and out guess what they find you via the end points. then when those addresses are flagged as being mixed. your then highlighted and flagged.
..
as for the other points of your post.
again you make a statement then say the opposite after of the same post.
for instance
you just admitted chip mixer was braking the law [not just] for being an unregistered money transmitter service, [but also doing laundering.]
you then pretend to say you have never seen in any court mixing equated to some unlicensed money transmitting service product.. yet chip mixer (your own example you do know about) is in court for BOTH crimes
chip mixer got shut down because of laundering. the owner got slapped with a lawsuit due to financially gaining from it which is the test of being a payment facilitator/financial transmitter service (Money Service Business / Payment Facilitator)
if you want to set up a service. learn from these things. dont pretend they didnt happen(while foolishly mentioning them in the same breath)
just because you plead ignorant by not doing research or ignoring anything you have seen to pretend you did not see it. actually read stuff and learn from it.
regulations do mention that mixing is a red flag that will get you noticed.
ill say it 5 more times
regulations do mention that mixing is a red flag that will get you noticed.
regulations do mention that mixing is a red flag that will get you noticed.
regulations do mention that mixing is a red flag that will get you noticed.
regulations do mention that mixing is a red flag that will get you noticed.
regulations do mention that mixing is a red flag that will get you noticed.
let that thought rattle around in your head for a while
so one last time
when mixing is the bad word of regulation.. be smart.. invent something new that does not sound like the word mixer. offers a different feature as its advertised service. where the unspoken side effect is the taint of deposits is not the same as the taint of withdrawals..
get the hint yet?? or is your mixer advertising contract so strict that you cant escape just advertising mixers