Consider the facts and then reconsider your stance.
Player:
- Gives detailed explanation of situation. Provides evidence.
- Gives site permission to share any evidence.
- Offers to go to arbitration, gives permission to site to share all info with third party.
- Result of arbitration in their favor.
Casino:
- Does not provide any details or even a specific accusation.
- Agrees to arbitration, loses.
- Still doesn't pay.
- Ghosts forum.
- Only been around for 6 months.
- Obvious ties to the longest running scam casino on the forum that is well known for freerolling players by making vague accusations against winners, seizing their profit, returning only their deposit and then going silent.
It's not that I am not aware. Of course I am aware but why don't you consider the response from the license providers too? That does not seems the OP is innocent. Or you are saying licensor are protecting their clients and risking their reputation for 100s of others casinos they provided license.
Why would you defend the casino? And yes, that is what you're doing.
Do you really think I am defending a specific casino? Since you asked [not sure why] then let me ask the same. Don't you think you are defending the OP blindly? Defending him just because he posted something which looks like legit to you but truth is you and I can not prove if that is indeed legit. Haven't we seen such accusations all the time against other casinos? Common accusations:
Casino x banned my account
Casino x confiscated my deposit
Casino x not responding to my PMs
Casino x is a scam
Casino x is 1xbit
Casino x do not pay my winning.
The entire scan accusation filled with such type of threads but it seems all your focus is one defending OP and seeing a specific casino should go down to the hole.
Why?