I wish you had checked our articles at least once before giving us a red flag. We say that some project is fraudulent because of some reasons. Can you deny that reason?
We say this project does not have a team. That project does not have a roadmap or business plan.
Why do you focus on the sidelines instead of paying attention to the main story?
Please anyone who has ever paid us to change an article come forward and share proof.
We are one of the few sites that working so hard and honestly for 3 years to help people.
I don't care if the project is fraudulent or not, but the fact that you are willing to up the score for a fee says something about you. It simply means even if the project was truly fraudulent, for a price, you will turn a blind eye to the red flags and convince your audience that the project is legitimate
You can not be trusted
We also know how to read and comprehend. Read your reply again

I suggest that instead of spending your time on FUD Antidolos, you should talk about your project and the weaknesses we have mentioned. Your project is not bad and a 6.1 score is suitable for it. But if you think this is unfair, you can explain it instead of trying to challenge our honest mission with a bunch of lies.
Everything is good until this was posted
And until now you haven't addressed this issue, there is extortion on this screenshot and we all have that impression, now tell us if this is not extorting $1000 for a good rate what is it?