Dear Gcarreno ,
You said that this project " either a scam, or a bunch.....".
May I ask you a question that whether the N3RicsZoDsDsNhnt2qirkR2HwVC3GFZ is owned by you? It has Alias as "gcarreno-main".
I found that there is 12015 NOSO in it (
http://explorer.nosocoin.com/getaddressbalance.html?address=N3RicsZoDsDsNhnt2qirkR2HwVC3GFZ), also it is running a MN on 216.127.162.8;8080.
If it is not owned by you, then please ignore this message. Otherwise, could you please tell me why you only sold ~1500 NOSO in 7sea exchange, keep 12000NOSO and running a MN? Should we run away from this "scam" project? I am confused.
Dragon
====================
>> address N3RicsZoDsDsNhnt2qirkR2HwVC3GFZ
Address : N3RicsZoDsDsNhnt2qirkR2HwVC3GFZ
Alias : gcarreno-main
Summary : 12015.88536769 (442)
Incoming : 0.00000000
Outgoing : 0.00000000
Available : 12015.88536769
Masternode: Active
>> history N3RicsZoDsDsNhnt2qirkR2HwVC3GFZ
Last block : 109829
Address : N3RicsZoDsDsNhnt2qirkR2HwVC3GFZ
INCOMINGS
Mined : 0
Mined blocks :
Transactions : 1
Coins : 0.14928767
PoS Payments : 0
PoS Earnings : 0.00000000
OUTGOINGS
Transactions : 8
Coins : 1590.17000000
TOTAL : -1590.02071233
SUMARY : 12015.88536769
Transactions
109764] N3T4jeimYwgd1YHBqSex8C43eTXHYDm--> 30.00000000
109614] N3T4jeimYwgd1YHBqSex8C43eTXHYDm--> 60.00000000
109253] N3T4jeimYwgd1YHBqSex8C43eTXHYDm--> 60.00000000
109219] N3aXz2RGwj8LAZgtgyyXNRkfQ1EMnFC<-- 0.14928767
108797] N3T4jeimYwgd1YHBqSex8C43eTXHYDm--> 1000.00000000
108740] N3T4jeimYwgd1YHBqSex8C43eTXHYDm--> 60.00000000
108124] N3T4jeimYwgd1YHBqSex8C43eTXHYDm--> 60.00000000
107324] N3T4jeimYwgd1YHBqSex8C43eTXHYDm--> 60.00000000
106652] N3T4jeimYwgd1YHBqSex8C43eTXHYDm--> 260.00000000
==========================================
Hey Y'all,
I need to thank both
@nightraven and
@MMOStars for coming forward and backing the story that Noso is,
NOW, either a scam, or a bunch of people in panic mode trying to recoup a very bad investment of time. There was a time when this coin had a future

In my previous message on this thread I was probably a bit too technical, or just a bit too
rambly...
Nonetheless, I think that
@nightraven was a lot more eloquent and for that I thank him a lot!!
Cheers,
Gus