I think it's still on point. I mean, can even a legitimate project be beaten by a less influential review company? If they only need $1k not to post bullshit reviews, at least you have a bigger allocation than that to pay for other ad services that drive your project's visibility faster. In the end, they fell far behind and catching up was a waste of time.
On my side, they'renot a big bully tbh. I had never even heard of their site.
Glad to hear about us now.
Suppose we are a bunch of stupid frauds who extort money from people
Does this change the truth about the documents we expose about the projects?
We have analyzed dozen projects so far. From scam projects to good ICOs.
Maybe we can take money and make weak projects look good, but can we destroy good projects with lies? While every paragraph comes with evidence and so far 90% of the scams that we exposed have been proven.[/b]
-Was the offer of $1k valid (assuming only a friendly offer, no extortion at all)?
- (if you answered yes to the question above) In the title of the published article[1] of course this sounds bad for readers in general, but is it okay for you to still offer marketing services to projects that you mark yourself as a risk?
- What will you do if BKS hires marketing services, I mean will you still publish the same article[1] on your site? Or will you speak differently elsewhere?
1. https://antidolos.com/backstage-bks-blockchain-is-a-high-potential-on-the-downslide/