I don't understand this "censorship" argument. The ability to create BRC-20 tokens was recently added to Bitcoin's code by the developers.
And no doubt you'd then be calling for more intervention to censor that too. Where does it end?
You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of the word "censor" and "central authority" or else are throwing around harsh words to further your opinion to others. The well-being of Bitcoin's #1 use over the last 14 years and the trust that it has generated over that time as an always reliable method of peer-to-peer transactions, is under attack caused by the spam these tokens have introduced. Let's both agree to disagree on how Bitcoin should be changed, going forward. The community will decide the consensus of how things should or should not be changed again.