Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]
by
Crypto Library
on 14/05/2023, 21:48:07 UTC
~
The way Ireland started their innings I thought Ireland would win today's match very easily. They collected 109 runs in the second wicket pair. But at the end of 45 overs, the Ireland team collected 237 runs after losing 6 wickets. Ireland needs 38 runs from 30 balls. It doesn't seem easy to me. Lorcan Tucker and McBrine are batting at the crease. If Tucker can stay at the crease then Ireland has a chance of winning. But the bowling of Bangladesh's bowlers is now very controlled. They want to win the series 2-0. Bangladesh will try their best to win the match.
With the way Ireland performed till the 40th over, they were in control of the match and expected them to win the match easily but the breakthrough from Najmul Hossain Shanto started the Ireland's downfall and Mustafizur Rahman returned to bowl his quota and started picking wickets and started restricting the run flow and Hasan Mahmud bowled a wonderful final over that helped Bangladesh win the match and the series.
I am actually surprised that Ireland lost this easy match, but congratulations to the Bangladesh team. Finally, even in the first match being lucky by raining for Ireland, but could not stop Bangladesh from winning this ODI series. However, I would like to applaud the performance of Ireland in today's match, if the crickets did not fall down so quickly towards the end, then maybe Ireland could have won today's match. Paul Stirling, Andy Balbirnie, Harry Tector, Lorcan Tucker, these four players have done amazing batting performances. However, I hope Ireland can correct the mistakes of this match in the next match.
And talking about Bangladesh's performance, I would say today their bowling performance towards the last helped them to win, especially Mustafizur Rahman's three wickets in the last I think today was possible. Also, in batting, Tamim Iqbal may have answered his haters today for his last match performance, but his sixty-nine was not bad.
source