[...]
100% YES.
Investors are our only valuable asset and we've a big database of investors & hunters. We didn't pay for this info and it is completely voluntary.
100% YES.
Investors are our only valuable asset and we've a big database of investors & hunters. We didn't pay for this info and it is completely voluntary.
I can't be the only one aware that you conveniently left out the part about stars and supportive comments? What about them? They're made by people who truly using the platform in subject, and all of them has to be extremely satisfied? 5 stars. Does it mean suppose there are 60 reviewers, legit reviewers from which I have no idea where you get them from, 10 of them leave a 4 stars review, which doesn't met your service agreement, so you'll have to ask them to not publish it? Quite sure cherry picking is not fair in the world of reviewing a service or platform. Is this honesty? How about if you only have 30 out of those 60 who gave 5 stars? You'll ask the other 30 to not post their review while hunting for more reviewers --again, not sure where you get the legit people who reviewed a platform for the sole purpose of reviewing it instead of getting paid for it-- and so on and so on until you achieve 50? Again, is this honesty?
[...]
We may not be the last person, but we're one of the last sites that act this way. If an anonymous victim messages Lovesmayfamilis and asks for help, is he/she willing to follow the case to the courts of India or Pakistan? Probably many bloggers, YouTubers, admins, and Influencers help people (and we truly respect them) but I don't think they help outside of their mobile and laptops.
We may not be the last person, but we're one of the last sites that act this way. If an anonymous victim messages Lovesmayfamilis and asks for help, is he/she willing to follow the case to the courts of India or Pakistan? Probably many bloggers, YouTubers, admins, and Influencers help people (and we truly respect them) but I don't think they help outside of their mobile and laptops.
So now you're no longer "the last force", but one of "the last" person and one of the last sites. Falling down pretty quick from the initial position of your statement, eh? Curious about one thing, how much will it cost for someone to solve a case to the court of India or Pakistan? Free? I have specific someone in mind that is in trouble and last i check --haven't open their thread for days now-- they're looking for a lawyer to help them. Also have another one in mind with significantly less amount of money, but currently in an indisputable situation against a platform, care to mediate them and fly back and forth between their countries? You can fly there and help them both? Pro bono? Or will it cost tens of thousands of dollars?
Is this enough? All we say is that this project overstates everything. They rely too much on names.
Interesting. I'd really love if I could verify that you're indeed talking with Ms. Valge and not talking to each other with yourself or one of your team. Care to show us the profile box that shows her username with that chat on the background? I am sure a scam buster know what I mean and how to provide it.
[...]
The truth is that we didn't know they were against us until a couple of days ago and we didn't know about this topic either.
The last paragraph of the chat he shared is fake. After our proposal, he said that he would consult with the team and inform us. We are such simple and kind people.
We published the article and waited for their payment to start our services.
The truth is that we didn't know they were against us until a couple of days ago and we didn't know about this topic either.
The last paragraph of the chat he shared is fake. After our proposal, he said that he would consult with the team and inform us. We are such simple and kind people.
We published the article and waited for their payment to start our services.I don't think whether the last paragraph of the archived chat log is real or fabricated is relevant. It was provided simply for the reason you asked them to show the entire chat, where you imply there will be something there to tip the balance towards your side, as stated below:
[...]
I stress that OP has deleted the chats & I can't provide a screenshot. But if he shows the previous conversation, you'll notice that we said we can help to improve your project cause you have the potential. As we removed the word "FAKE" word from the draft and even published the photos that OP gave us as proof.
[...]
I stress that OP has deleted the chats & I can't provide a screenshot. But if he shows the previous conversation, you'll notice that we said we can help to improve your project cause you have the potential. As we removed the word "FAKE" word from the draft and even published the photos that OP gave us as proof.
[...]
It does not negate the fact that you asked some sum of money for some rating boost. In fact, anyone reading that conversation in full will very likely understand that you removed the word "FAKE" is simply as a bargaining chip, a gesture of good will that will turn sour when your request got denied.
The chat is filled with implied threat every now and then.