What is strange is that this casino has been operating since last year, but when I search for them on google there is nothing, there are no reviews on many sites, in fact not even on just 1 site I did not see it when I search for them on google, this clearly shows that they have not been expanding the marketing campaign, probably they are doing this to not draw too much attention, as they are making selective payments so it is more advantageous for them that they only have customers coming from here on the forum than a place where they can control
OP hasn't been active since April 20th maybe he already got the money he set as a goal in his robbery scheme and now he doesn't need to keep logging into the forum and all he needs to do is sit and watch deposits come into the casino his is to take the money and spend it in the real world, the great advantage of anonymity for casino owners is that they can steal people's money and then they will create another casino that will steal people's money, I don't understand how license providers are happy to see people doing KYC in casinos while the owner of the casino remains anonymous and can steal people's money and remain unpunished. that's not fair
It's obvious that they're underperforming in terms of expanding their site's public reach; reviews are mostly about client complaints; the majority of feedback casino sites receive is undoubtedly related to poor improvement; casino sites should exhibit modifications so as to meet the satisfaction of their clients. That should be their ultimate goal at the start of this critical circumstance. Furthermore, we should not simply blast into the mindset of scammers, but there have been a series of cases where casino sites intentionally disable their withdrawal function in order to deny their clients the possibility of triggering their profits earned, which is simply not the case because OP is back online and has given reasons best known to him and has apologized for their casino site's unexpectedly dismal results.