That's where I'm at right now. Thoroughly dismayed by calls for a centrally-planned intervention over something that could have been averted if people had raised their concerns earlier. Much like Bitcoin itself, I don't see how you put the genie back in the bottle. This can't be un-invented.
doomad you are part of the idiot brigade. you dont want ordinals to be stopped.
secondly. when features that caused the exploit were promoted. their promotion lulled the majority to sleep with fake promises. and those point out the problems had you lot screaming at those calling out the issues,. trying to get people to shut up about the abuses.
take 2 promises of taproot for instance
1. taproot will look exactly like a segwit where no one can tell the difference between taproot or segwit
2. taproot scripts will only be the length of 1 signature length thus not bloat the witness.
so heres the issue
1. taproot is VERY easy to spot.. bc1p instead of bc1q
2. taproot allows upto 4mb of witness cludge in one transaction
many people have for years brought up the issues when things got softened. you want to pretend "just franky" and then with that ignorance say "because its just franky he must be wrong because no one back him up"
sorry but many have called it out. but its the ignorance of "trust a dev not the rules" that has been heard more.