Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
Either the article or your citing the article seems a bit lost... deceptive, vague, incomplete.. .. .
related to this thread or not?
I saw that the word "bitcoin" used one time in the article, and perhaps they might start to understand what they are attempting to achieve a wee bit moar better if they at least attempted to figure out what they are doing.. and maybe describing what they are doing in terms of how it might or might not relate to bitcoin.
Sure.. payment rails.. might be important... . and there are a variety of currencies that exist in the world and there are also ways to be coy in regards to what is happening if you don't say what you are talking about.. and maybe no one really knows, even though an article seemed to be important to put out in regards to the topic.
......
...(oops, naughty word, sorry jay... <batslappening>)
I am starting to consider that you, sirazimuth, might be devolving and spiraling into a bit of a lost cause. I am not sure if you can be saved from ur lil selfie.. yet.. since I am kind of a nice guy like that... "we" might need to consider to provide you with one more chance to redeem ur lil selfie..
Accordingly, I am thinking that perhaps if you were to go to a chalk board, and write something like:
"I will only talk about bitcoin, dee cornz, my lil precious, king daddy, lillie fiends, honey badger and/or other appropriate references in the Wall Observer thread"
This might possibly start to work to cure (distract) you so long as you write such phraseology 21 million times, and you might ask: "why 21 million times?," and I might well suggest that you get the fuck started writing and ponder away regarding such answer in the months and years to come.
That'll keep you busy until at least 2025...
Just saying.
You are absolutely right, JayJuanGee. I must endeavor to discuss dee cornz in this here famous thread to the extent......are grifters, shitcoiners, scammers, bullshitters. ...........
AKA... crypto in a nutshell. ...(oops, naughty word, sorry jay... <batslappening>)
Accordingly, I am thinking that perhaps if you were to go to a chalk board, and write something like:
"I will only talk about bitcoin, dee cornz, my lil precious, king daddy, lillie fiends, honey badger and/or other appropriate references in the Wall Observer thread"
This might possibly start to work to cure (distract) you so long as you write such phraseology 21 million times, and you might ask: "why 21 million times?," and I might well suggest that you get the fuck started writing and ponder away regarding such answer in the months and years to come.
That'll keep you busy until at least 2025...
Just saying.
the mentionings happen more often (with respect to the uppities and downitys) of our lillie fiend, King daddy in
regard to whether or not our investment schemes (in terms of and to the extent they align with our thinkinenings) that youie pooie
would have us believe with perhaps our lil selfies being more open to the 60% possibilities that dee cornz may
well have a downity dip though an uppity pumpening would not be out of the questioning due to (and in regards to)
our lil friend being maybe perhaps heading to no mans land (to the extent we could reach fuck you status)
and in that regard perhaps this directional would surely cause drama within and/or with respect to the
various thinkenings of the dumb shits and twats based on their shitcoins rather than our lil fiend that
would have us speculatening about various timenings (within and with regard to the markets) in terms of our beliefs (and to the extent) of
our overall well being that King Daddy may well bring us in our future endeavors of (and in terms of) financial freedom.
GO BITCOIN
That's a good start.
There's hope for the salvation of uie-pooie in them there words of yours.
A song might be nice.
1000$ for that Miami conference wow.
Why not 1000 sats ?
Why not 1000 sats ?
It costs money to put on a conference... and especially such a large conference.
Sure, maybe they did not strike a good balance this year in regards to price versus expected attendance levels.. and so it likely is not easy to determine those kinds of matters, when the likely attendance levels may well vary quite a bit this year as compared with last year...
I have not seen the latest numbers, but I thought that they might have been anticipated quite a few less than half of the number of participants as compared to last year's 30k-ish levels, even if initially, they were likely hoping to reach similar levels as last year.. but even those very large numbers (like last year) become unwieldy too.. so increases in prices would surely cause the number of attendants to go down, one would think.
Daily EMA 200 retest is a must for bulls imo. We will watch the strength there.
You must be new here.
King daddy (and/or bulls) no does not understand the word "must" within the context that you are using such word.