All this criticism is wiped out simply by letting industry experts vet the DynexSolve technology in public, as you agreed to.
It would seem the Dynex team is watching this space as they've organized an independent crypto youtuber to validate their claims that their SAT solver is real:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkgPwYXCTeYOn the surface this seems like an incredible feat, solving something in minutes than in days (or never). However, their demo solver seems to be an implementation of a parallel local search SAT solver. They have been well researched and operate on a two common techniques; Parallel local search algorithms and the portfolio approach. A few relevant links on the topic:
The last example is a generic SAT implementation that can solve the "transformed_barthel_n_100000_r_8.000_p0_0.080_instance_001.cnf" example problem in 14.32 seconds on a low spec computer, not infinity. With some tuning it should be close to the Dynex implementation.