Having read a bit more, it certainly sounds encouraging.
So yes, this is what "devs need to fix it" looks like. Not "HuRr DuRr BaNz ThEmZ nAo PlZ!" like the censorship supporters want. The provision off an off-chain solution is ideal for this sort of thing. Although I'm sure franky1 will still hate it for reasons known only to him.
So yes, this is what "devs need to fix it" looks like. Not "HuRr DuRr BaNz ThEmZ nAo PlZ!" like the censorship supporters want. The provision off an off-chain solution is ideal for this sort of thing. Although I'm sure franky1 will still hate it for reasons known only to him.
Now it comes down to hardest part, where people need to convince Ordinal user switch to
"You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink".
All that can be done is to present favourable conditions to transact more efficiently. But it involves sacrificing a small amount of security in order to gain the cheaper method of reaching their destination. On-chain will always provide the most security, but it's not the most efficient method. If people choose to take the inefficient and costly route and are prepared to pay for it, that's their prerogative. This applies equally to both financial and non-financial transactions.