Such transaction would be deemed non-standard though since the standard enforce only 1 OP_RETURN with maximum size 80 bytes per transaction. And while people can split X OP_RETURN output to X transaction, there are big overhead which supposed to discourage people from adding tons of arbitrary data.
right. so people saying that bitcoin shouldn't be used to store data well, that capability has always existed. what those people really must have an issue with is if their fees go higher. that's what they're really complaining about...because they never complained about op-return.
Now it comes down to hardest part, where people need to convince Ordinal user switch to Taro Taproot asset rather than Ordinal to create NFT/token.
ordinals is a fad. so reasoning doesn't really come into play when you try and convince people about something, that's how it looks to me anyway. you could present them with free nfts on ethereum and they would still use ordinals just because.