You calling it censorship also doesn't make any sense because you never called version 0 censorship when it placed a limit on the witness size preventing exactly this attack.
I do understand the purpose of such limitations, but please acknowledge this isn't going to prevent people from using Bitcoin as a cloud storage. You can't prevent that, even if you completely break forwards-compatibility and invalidate every transaction that isn't standard. You're just going to make the rules stricter, making the Bitcoin network vulnerable to enforcing rules based on subjective criteria.
So why all of a sudden requiring to place similar limit on version 1 is considered censorship?!
Because now people make usage of it, and because I'm not so ignorant to tell what people are allowed to do in the most freedom-supporting network on the planet.