by holding the prize from the bounty it might be possible to increase 2x, but it is also possible to decrease until it is worthless. projects that look good sometimes fall short of expectations. I personally, if I get a coin from a signature and it can be sold, I choose to sell it and buy a coin that can be used for long-term investment, so it's like being able to save bitcoin or ethereum. but sadly there are not many decent bounty prizes at the moment, but keep the spirit to get lucky in the world of bounty hunters
Yes, to be honest this is the main reason for the success and failure of bounties, sometimes holding back to get at least a price increase, and sometimes holding on to make a project lose value, but I'm interested in selling it and exchanging it for another coin to make a more valuable investment.
Each stage will have a different view of this work, I don't think the quality of the campaigns is the cause as people can decide for themselves whether to participate in them or not. Even when there are many scam projects, or poor prizes, many hunters are optimistic about participating or it may just be spam.
Nowadays some new approaches to projects are being implemented in a variety of ways, we can discuss testnet or retroactive and they have been and are still an approach that I find very practical. from work as well as community and project interactions. And when it comes to the bitcointalk bounty I'm most likely thinking that if there's no change in the way it works or a growth cycle takes place, the status of quality or not paying will still be obvious.