Whether you agree with how others are interpreting your views or not is immaterial. It's all moot. If you want change, don't just talk about it, get something done.
well about the only thing someone could really do is fork bitcoin. bitcoin has forked before. small blocks vs bigger blocks. this one could be monkeys vs no monkeys. but no one has stepped up to the plate to do that YET. maybe franky could do that. he would need to be on the lookout for things like the ORC-20 tokens though.
https://www.bei24.com/post/what-is-orc-20-an-upgrade-of-brc-20-orc-20-vs-brc-20-exploring-the-future-potential
a fork is when more then one chain sustains.. AKA creating an altcoin
otherwise its just an orphan event of rejecting a few blocks until the pools all congregate and follow one chain of blocks(aka not a fork not a altcoin)
now let me make this as clear as possible
you can upgrade/downgrade/change/reinforce the rules again, without causing a fork.
the only option is not to only make changes on an altcoin
stop with the crap of pretending that the only option is to create another network.. stop telling people to use another network if they dislike what bitcoin has been broken into. there is another option. fix the exploit
your falling into the same dumb scripts as what doomad is recruiting people to say. dont fall into the dumb trap
there are ways to fix the exploit without needing to move to another network
putting limits on lengths of witness per transaction again will just as nutildah admits grandfather old memes and json crap(we are stuck holding that old data) but it pretends new transactions from including long useless data
also having rules again to expect certain validatable data per opcode/sigop use where the bytes need to meet a specification/format or be associated with a certain policy would mean even short junk would get rejected becasue it isnt a script/signature