Talking about actual wagering requirements is already on the casino website itself from the existing terms and conditions, after all, before betting there's nothing wrong with reading the casino requirements so you don't get stuck with withdrawal problems that will be asked for wagering requirements with a certain nominal.
Some casinos do not have the same wagering requirements as most casinos, which is why we are sometimes surprised in the end. However, if it's stated in the rules, then we can't consider them a bad casino. It's our responsibility to read and understand the terms of service (TOS). Ultimately, it depends on the satisfaction of the gamblers. If we're not satisfied with a particular casino, we are free to try other casinos with TOS that are convenient for us to follow.
Let us not make things complicated, you like a casino, you stay, you hate it the you leave.
As easy as that, and very logical in terms of reading TOS as everything was written, and it's our obligation to read and understand what's inside the rules, unless it's a direct scamming practice where the owners/facilitators is doing changing things in favor of the house, but it's better to listen with your last statement, if you like to stay it's your right to stay if you don't want the service then no one will force you to stay, you can quit your way and not to bother using the site / service again.
Of course, you should always read the TOS carefully. However, sometimes the devs and, accordingly, the legal services of the casino draw up separate requirements and TOS clauses in such a way that the details of these rules can only be understood by carefully reading them several times. Another option for interpreting the points of the rules is the general norms of the current legislation in the jurisdiction in which this casino is registered. And often a simple player has no idea about such general rules of law. And in disputable, critical situations, such norms can be applied, which will be completely unexpected for a player who is not very well prepared in legal terms. And then there are scandals with support and sometimes even in courts.
However, the interpretation of individual points of the TOS is always based on the general rules of law in a judicial proceeding. And there is little chance for such a negligent player to prove his position in court and win the lawsuit.
I wrote this so that you would think carefully about the individual points of the TOS when you read them, precisely taking into account the general rules of law. And such rules of law also need to be known for a particular jurisdiction. For example, a provision such as the application of case law or the absence of such practice. This is done differently in different countries.