I disagree with you totally. But that is OK no? I can't imagine a world where all the people think in the same way.
Some people can debate with you that there is not such thing like true random...
I like the random values that /dev/urandom give...
Have a good day.
When I say 50% more I mean the number of digits.
you software example.
you range 1000000000 (10 digits)
target=
12345600000000000000(20 digits)
your software will change the first few digits(red) every x amount of keys.
which does slow down the search compared to a "real random " which changes all the range digits for each key.
And yes, a real random does not technically exist, but you want to deny without giving arguments, you know very well what I mean.