Nobody really cares even in this forum if you're using AI to create your posts as long as you're not wearing a sig and you don't get paid for copy pasting answers,
It's surprising that you say that when you yourself have participated
in a thread about the subject where people does not distinguish whether AI users wear a paid signature or not.
Let's see what a moderator has to say:
The forum soon will be overrun with low quality AI generated posts, just because there is a financial gain in it, it is easy to do and the tools are available to everyone.
It should be treated the same as plagiarism. Asking an AI something then copy and pasting the response is just as bad if not worse than plagiarism because it's not as easy to detect, though the posts do kind of stand out...
I don't see a distinction there as to whether the AI user wears a paid signature or not.
but in this case he did it for money and in a campaign that openly prohibits that, so yeah, it's quite close to being tag worthy.
I give you that, he broke the rules of a campaign he was participating in, and that's wrong, but the vision I have is not so far-fetched because at the moment he only has two neutral tags, while if we were talking about a $40 loan default (the approximate amount he earned for the signature campaign) his profile would a few red tags already.