Eh, JollyGood is just asking a general question that's probably on the minds of quite a few members here, and as far as criminals using any mixer service.
It seems to me that JollyGood very clearly targeted only one mixer in the subject. He also leaves a reference to this discussion only in the Sinbad ANN thread, I would say try to dramatize everything more.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5416985.msg62321741#msg62321741If you were to observe everything from the point of view of someone who came here to get information about which mixer to use, how do you see this Jolly's performance?
At the same time, he obviously did not research everything enough.
This has already been discussed, and T3PR00T posted the reference from those discussions.
I'm pretty sure that the owner of Whirlwind or Hhampuz as a signature manager doesn't want this kind of campaign.
Can I ask a counter question,
Is Whirlwind.money Next To Be Shutdown? 
Why stop there, earlier we saw different paths of the mixer. Can I start a global discussion about mixers with something like
Is Whirlwind.money Next To Be an exit scam? Or if The Sceptical Chymist wants it to be more global we can include Unijoin in this way, it would really encourage discussion. We just need to change the name of the mixer with passive accusations.
Also, to my knowledge Whirlwind have not been accused of money laundering by any law enforcement agency nor is their owner/operator the subject of an international arrest warrant. Having said that, criminals will use anything that is available for conducting (or trying to conduct) criminal acts.
Whirlwind has only been operating for a few months. How do you know the same thing won't happen to them? A group of hackers will mix coins through it and it can easily be accused of money laundering. As far as I know, not a single mixer has a solution to protect against "dirty funds".
btw. JollyGood did you read the discussions posted by T3PR00T before starting this topic?