Re: A Non-Custodial wallet, Atomic Wallet, being compromised
⭐ Merited by hosseinimr93 (1)
Why do people choose to not use reputable, open-source software when it comes to their life savings? I mean, you seriously don't think it's a good idea to spend an hour or two extra, to ensure you won't just let a stranger ruin your life?
I mean, we are still at a stage where lots of people still keep their life savings in centralized exchange and DeFi protocols 
People are advised to avoid them year in year out, but they are still dumb and lazy enough to secure their money.
This incident should be one of those real life situations that highlights why a closed source wallet even if noncustodial is very dangerous. Reproducibility should also be emphasized.
XRP, a shitcoin, does not have any reputable wallet software for it.
1 more reason to avoid the shitcoin then 
So the jerks provided an update on Reddit a few hours ago, but I gotta say it's the most useless update about such a grave situation
update...
At the moment less than 1% of our monthly active users have been affected/reported. Last drained transaction was confirmed over 40h ago. Security investigation is ongoing. We report victim addresses to major exchanges & blockchain analytics to trace and block the stolen funds.
At the moment less than 1% of our monthly active users have been affected/reported. Last drained transaction was confirmed over 40h ago. Security investigation is ongoing. We report victim addresses to major exchanges & blockchain analytics to trace and block the stolen funds.
Less than 1%!! Really?
How do they determine if the users were less than 1%. Why don't they value what has been drain in monetary terms instead of stupid percentages.