Why would they? Is their a clause added that they need to explain themselves.
They will not put a clause that they need to explain when questioned, if they put it, it's already a big warning sign.
No one was forced to participate in their bounty campaign and in the ICO!
They cannot force anyone they can only invite and when they launch a marketing campaign they expose their platform to investors part of exposing your project is addressing concerns.
Risk is a prime factor when you either in invest or work for a new project as a bounty hunter.
There are risks but when these risks are exposed you will not invest or work on this kind of project
The problem starts when you do not have any factual evidence of scam and then you use the same forum to speculate a scam on anew project. We are in 2023, scam is common, unless any concrete evidence is provide I think such topics doesn't make any sense.
I think OP has worked and invested in a lot of ICO so he knew that there are warning signs and if the warnings are not yet there it will be there it's just a matter of time to show up, I call this insight.