The controversial story about Satoshi being the main brain behind bitcoin is yet to be settled, as other crypto experts belief that David Chaum should be given the credit.
How comes did you arrived here again on this matter, have you dive into the historical background to discover many other researchers who have contributed in one way or the other in the digital technology, we have the blockchain technology, bitcoin network and the cryptocurrency entirely, just as you cannot call Hal Finney the rightful owner or inventor of bitcoin then don't try to create or join other in creating a scene in continuation to what Craig Wright has started, David Chaum may be part of the story but not the inventor of bitcoin.
but,putting all this controversies and talks aside, who really cares if Satoshi Nakamoto is the brain behind the big project ?, like, why do people still debate so heavily on this ?.
No one cares but we all know and believed that Satoshi is the inventor of bitcoin and we don't have to made a public propaganda on this because it's an already settled and done deal.
since we already know the great impact Bitcoin would bring to humanity, then why argue on who to attribute it to ?.
Or maybe you're just servig as a career agent for their argument no one is interested about, you can't moderate people from using the name Satoshi or claiming Satoshi, we know right from the beginning that they will make such noise to either antagonize, feel gealous, or counter the success already achieved with bitcoin.