I guess me and people on most country[1] still in stone age 
[1] https://www.speedtest.net/global-index
[1] https://www.speedtest.net/global-index
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/average-internet-speed-by-state
in the usa, only california is under 100mpbs but they're sitting at 91. that's stone ages. most states in the usa are at least 300 or 400 mbps. that's still pretty slow...seems like the industry overall has stagnated in terms of higher speeds. stagnated for YEARS. they want to keep charging the same rates for sub-standard technology and service.
So what? USA isn't the whole world.
Quote
i seriously doubt people would be willing to pay for 100Mbps service and then only get less than 10% of it.
Guess you don't live in an area where comcast has a monopoly. In many places they have a "100Mbps" which rarely performs, but lets them claim that they provide broadband for the purpose of government reports.In addition, ISP around the world would advertise their service with words such as "up to X Mbps". So if you get less than X, they couldn't be sued without very serious effort since they use term "up to" which is annoying.
--snip--
Honestly I'd much rather see BTC merge mining with doge+LTC than with any of this inefficient BRC20 crap. Maybe BIP301 is on to something.LTC miners already perform merge mining on DOGE though, where both use Scrypt. I doubt BTC, LTC and DOGE community can reach agreement on your idea. Besides, BTC miners already could perform merge mining with Bitcoin sidechain and different altcoin. Although to be honest the TX volume of those are very low.