So, what exactly did marlboroza lie about regarding the feedback they left on your profile? From what I can see, the feedback appears to be factually accurate and supported by evidence.
Malboroza's lies include:
1) I sell accounts
2) I give myself trust ratings
3) I can't be trusted
4) I scam people
No, that's not what the trust feedback on your profile states. Allow me to quote it for you:
| | marlboroza | | 2019-09-10 | | Reference | | Account is part of larger farming ring, involved in all kind of shady activities(trading accounts, trading hacked accounts, abusing bounties with alt accounts, leaving positive trust between alt accounts, farming trust, ban evasion with alt accounts.) archived http://archive.is/upTp0#selection-8583.0-8583.14 |
So, to clarify, he didn't accuse YOU of personally engaging in trading with hacked accounts, abusing bounties with alt accounts, engaging in trust abuse or farming, evading bans, or any other questionable activities. He simply stated that you are associated with a group of accounts that partake in such shady activities. Whether you were directly involved or it was the actions of others within your little gang is irrelevant. The bottom line is that you cannot be trusted. Now, the important question is, do you deny the evidence linking your account to that group?
Malboroza came up with that ALL by himself. There's no single one of my previous chats that talks about selling accounts or cheating someone.
You can go through my previous posts to see if you will see anything that involves selling accounts or cheating someone.
So, you're suggesting that we should solely focus on the posts from the account you're currently using and completely disregard any posts from other linked accounts? I'm curious, what's the reasoning behind this request? Why should we ignore the actions from those other accounts?