funny.. coming from the guy that wants people to prune thus no longer be full nodes.. both by not requiring to need to fully validate transactions (your love of backward compatibility of telling people they dont need to upgrade their node when new features arrive) and your adoration of pruning data thus not having FULL data to analyse or pass to other peers.
so you must not agree with people using electrum since it doesn't download a copy of the entire blockchain. or you don't agree with people telling other people its ok to use electrum instead of downloading the entire blockchain. i don't know what your problem is.
if people dont want to be full nodes they are free to use other software thats not a full node. however bitcoin core is a full node software.. which for people that want to be full nodes will want to use a full node software.. but lemmings like doomad even want to break that facility.. whilst trying to REKT ant choice of other brand alternatives of true full node utility that includes proposal making for upgrades.
he wants to tell and has told people false information such as by disabling full node functionality.. doomad pretend users are still full node capable even though they are not. simply because they are using "core" even with the full node features disabled.
he loves the "backward compatible" bait and switch. that has made it so users do not have to upgrade to stay compliant. which he pitches as pretending is nodes that are still FULLY even if they are not fully validating blocks/transactions nor archiving them FULLY