If Danny did indeed sell most of the BTC on the worst day possible, then that shows he knows nothing about how the markets work and running a business. Why were shareholders not informed of this? Why did he not buy back in when price was shown to be rising in November?

More lies I suspect.

It is possible he sold them to an accomplice or sock account so that he can show that they were sold on the day silk road caused the market to crash. In reality he still was in possession of the coins. As the price went up he was able to really sell the coins and benefit from the price increase.

Think of it this way. If I have 1000 BTC and claim to sell all at $100/BTC then I would have $100,000. If I only pretend to sell those coins and then later sell them at $1000/BTC then I would have a million dollars ($100,000 to account for the fake sale, and $900,000 of pure profit for myself). All the BTC would be accounted for by the fake sale and I would have $100,000 to show investors. I myself would have an extra $900,000 because I actually sold in the future and scammed investors.

TIME FOR A FORENSIC AUDIT ON THE BLOCK CHAIN OF THE ALLEGED TRANSTIONS HE MADE TO SEE WHERE THESE COINS WENT!!!