'That's about the size of it' so we say. I've never read Koestler's book, or any other one related to this topic for that matter.
Nor probably any book. Anyway, unless you clarify a little bit all that theory you got rumbling in you head, do not expect others to know. Converting to Judaism...interesting, and difficult.
...
It is, to me, currently the strongest hypothesis after many years of observation and general Occam's razor type stuff. Probably the strongest single observation that I've made is the intellectual Gestapo/Mafia tactics used against anyone who doesn't tow the 'kosher' line on the whole topic.
Koestler is widely recognized as a Jewish person who hoped in publishing his work that, to quote Wikipedia (which has been since it's early years Zionist occupied territory):
"he was convinced that if he could prove that the bulk of Eastern European Jews (the ancestors of today's Ashkenazim) were
descended from the Khazars, the racial basis for anti-Semitism would be removed and anti-Semitism itself could disappear"For my part, I would hope for the same thing and believe it quite possible to at least a notable degree. I would much rather focus on the particular actions of particular individual and groups than '
the Jews', but the intellectual cluster-fuck surrounding the whole topic make it, by careful design and dedicated effort, impossible to do.
Edit: I might add that a fair number of people who I believe to be a fairly modest sized group of genuine 'white supremacists' and genuinely 'anti-semitic' are not fond at all of the 'Khazarian hypothesis' and stick strongly to the Zionist's notion that all those who 'call themselves Jews' are genetically associated with with the 'Holy lands' and decedents of Jacob and all that horse-shit. Some of them probably do genuinely believe that as a consequence all 'Jews' should be rounded up and in some cases killed. I consider this evidence that these radical creeps are are largely cultivated and led around by the nose by Zionists/Khazarian Mafia types as they are far more useful to the cause than genuinely threatening. The best way to defeat an enemy is to lead it after all.
The funny thing about Bakhmut is that as soon as they "liberated" it and the regular Russian army took control of it they one day after,lost a town in the vicinity of Bakhmut,now there is a great counter attack going on there as Zelensky said today so I am afraid we won't see any such parade for the time being,now I think that the Russian parade of 9 May to be removed from their official holiday calendar as no one will remember them as winners of the second world war anymore but just as a terrorist state who blows up dams and flood cities,no other country in the world have done such terror acts even at war.
Actually, there is country that blew many German dams during WW2, dropped 2 nukes on civilians, used chemical weapons (agent orange), depleted uranium, napalm and phosphor bombs on civilians etc
Don't forget also the actual deployment of non-lethal biological weapons at home and around the world in order to achieve political and economic goals.
Yep, dam blowing is not new, it is just something that is considered a war crime by the Geneva convention. But I guess that if you are ok doing it, it is ok for others to use it at their own convenience.