Ninjastic
Home
Search
Users
Boards
Addresses
Ctrl + K
Toggle theme
Open menu
Post
Edited versions
Quotes to this post
Post
62391518
Topic
5456073
Board
Bitcoin Discussion
Merits
2 from 2 users
Topic OP
Do you think BIP 106 would have solved the Mempool congestion due to BRC20?
by
CounterEntropy
on
11/06/2023, 19:16:47 UTC
⭐ Merited by
iwantmyhomepaidwithbtc2
(1) ,
d5000
(1)
Because of the recent
Mempool congestion due to BRC20
some discussions of past crossed my mind.
Bitcoin Scalability Problem
is not new.
Block Size Limit Controversy
was a byproduct of this. This gave us multiple BIPs (
Bitcoin Improvement Proposal
) by multiple experts. Below is a consolidated list of those all...
BIP 100
by
Jeff Garzik
, Tom Harding & Dagur Valberg Johannsson
BIP 101
by
Gavin Andresen
BIP 102
by
Jeff Garzik
BIP 103
by
Pieter Wuille
BIP 104
by t.khan
BIP 105
by
BtcDrak
BIP 106
by
Upal Chakraborty
BIP 107
by
Washington Y. Sanchez
BIP 109
by
Gavin Andresen
Out of all these, I have always voiced in favor of
BIP 106 on BitcoinTalk
.
Proposal 2 : Depending on previous block size calculation and previous Tx fee collected by miners
has always seemed most practical & effective to me.
Now, as almost 8 years have passed and the scaling issue is still daunting us, what do you think about this proposal?