Seems to me that it's going to be a bad day for Sinbad
Nice rythme in this

On a serious note, you know how everyone say no pain no gain or no risk no gain...Whatever is coming is the cost of doing business, it's the nature of business!
and the people that's promoting them with campaign signatures.
Did not see this coming, and since when did things get to pinned on promoters (individuals )of a service ??
And in the years I have been on the forum I have never read a thread saying signature participants will be jointly liable for whatever comes out from a seizure or whatever it is....this has never happened or won't happen, otherthan sig ending and we all move on.
But I guess, if it hits a rogue nation's hacker group that provides funds for the rogue state, the sacrifice is hopefully worth it. I'm having mixed feelings with mixers now, I think that it's a freedom to be able to use it but then group's like the Lazarus group using it makes me want to change sides.
Mixers can't regulated businesses and they don't mind crossing the red tape as the clients are special clientele wanting to protect their digital footprint and the alike.