Snip.
Removal of the negative feedbacks from inactive members will defeat the purpose of that system, the feedbacks serves as a warning and caution for other people that might engage the person that has the feedback in the future so the system works just fine. Of course OP would say that it's unfair because he got almost all of the DT members on his bad side not to mention that the feedback is mentioning extortion which I think is a pretty serious offense, I mean isn't that a crime irl? His case isn't definitely one of those unfair ones, DT members in my experience in the forum aren't vindictive and logical when it comes to giving someone the ever infamous red trust.
Logically, when the police arrest someone, they must be accompanied by strong evidence, not based on wanting to show that authority is in their hands or the rank that is on their shoulders. DT members don't have any arrogance or personal grudges when sticking someone's butt with red paint, they work according to the rules that apply in the forum.
Op thinks like that because he feels he is standing in the right position, according to his point of view he has never felt he has ever made a mistake so he assumes that DT members have abused trust by damaging his reputation. I am one who believes in the workings of DT members who are still in a neutral position, they will not touch anyone if they have never made a mistake that has crossed the line in the forum.