Of a truth, Inter Milan weren't able to beat Manchester City to the UEFA Champions League title last Saturday but must be commended for they've achieved in the just concluded season.
Considering the amount of clear cut chances created in the that match, Inter Milan were the better side in the Champions League final but just that they weren't lucky enough to win it. It was a good season for Inter and their manager Simone Inzaghi who I think isn't getting all the media praises he deserves
I'm not trying to take anything away from Inter Milan, but they were not the better side in the final. Manchester City dominated the whole game. Inter were just more direct. Their directness led to them having chances, but that doesn't mean they were the better team. Manchester City also created chances that the failed to score. For a team to be the better team in astch, they have to had dominated their opponent.
Inter Milan were good defensively, and players like Lautaro Martinez, Dimarco, Berrella were very good for Inter but they couldn't just finish the work in attack.
As predicted, Manchester City played exceptionally well and dominated the game and ball possession. However, Inter had their own ways to obstruct and counter-press their opponents. In the first half, both teams managed to release 4 shots towards the goal. Nevertheless, in the end, Manchester City successfully broke through Inter's defense in the 68th minute, with Rodri kicking the ball into a difficult-to-reach corner for Oanana. Speaking of the better team, we can evaluate from the match that Manchester City was superior to Inter.