I was going to say something along those lines but I would also add that there are no TX details (faked or actual), so at best there is only a suspicion that the accused might take the collateral (assuming that after they had said they are prepared to use an escrow a potential borrower were to then go ahead and send that collateral to the lender direct). 

As you pointed out, it may be that the lender was trying to make themselves look worthy of conducting business with, but we don't even have solid proof ^{(i.e. use of the same wallet, email, twitter etc)} that the borrowers were alts - just a suspicion.

Given that unlike other parts of the Forum where there are strict rules forbidding admin/mods from deleting posts, now that the thread had been wiped, we may never know other than to have a hunch something untoward was going to occur.


Your opportunity to convince me with solid proof was little more than a personal attack.  Ironic really when the shoe was on the other foot you choose to lash out rather than convince me.

Flag Opposed ^{(unless of course you have actual proof, not just a hunch??)}