Stop spouting nonsense, your NFT have no impact on Bitcoin consensus. And i doubt having your NFT increase one's influence on bitcoin community.
Most of the people think Bitcoin is nonsense years ago. Time can proof it.
And you still pretend owning your NFT have impact on consensus, while it doesn't. On top of that, you doesn't even give explanation how your your NFT could have impact on Bitcoin consensus. At this point, i'll just quote this answer.
For a given network, consensus means achieving a consistent view of the global state between all participants. For Bitcoin, this means that all nodes/wallets should be considering the same utxo set. For Ethereum, it involves all participants having the same state trie. Minor other variations exist for other networks.
Mining and protocol versions are simply means to achieve this consensus - miners are motivated to only select valid transactions (transactions that spend unspent utxos, and meet other validity requirements) as their block will be dropped by other participants in the network if they produce an invalid block.
--snip--
Thanks, this quote inspired me. May be I have not explain clearly.
qrpaper is a NFT project, so the consensus of it just like other NFT project.
At the same time it's good for Bitcoin ecology consensus. Imagine if every new BlockChain project mint their WhitePaper on Bitcoin, it means they all acknowledge Bitcoin as the Base of BlockChain, and this is saluting to Bitcoin.