If a user funds their Samourai wallet, then Samourai creates a Tx0 to segregated unmixed change. If the user chooses to then combine a coinjoin output with that unmixed change, then there is nothing the coinjoin protocol can do to stop them.

If a user funds their Wasabi wallet, the transaction which funds that wallet will create unmixed change. If the user chooses to then combine a (surveilled and permissioned) coinjoin output with that unmixed change, then there is nothing the coinjoin protocol can do to stop them.

If a user swaps some coins to monero, the transaction which funded that swap will create unmixed change. If the user the swaps some monero back to bitcoin and combines that new bitcoin with the unmixed change, then there is nothing monero can do stop them.

Every privacy service or protocol in existence has the same weakness of a user combining unmixed changed with mixed outputs. That is not the fault of the privacy service or protocol, but the fault of the user.

On the other hand, the flaws in Wasabi such as constant address reuse, the largest party in the coinjoin receiving zero privacy, colluding with governments, supporting mass surveillance, attacking bitcoin's fungibility, directly funding the enemies of bitcoin, etc., are absolutely the fault of Wasabi.

Nope, I wasn't referring to sock puppeting at all. I was referring to Wasabi actively doxxing people who disagree with them. That's the behavior of real privacy loving cypherpunks.