Lmfao. So everyone in the world is storing all their coins on Wasabi all the time? No one
ever sends a transaction to their Wasabi wallet which has a change output?

Now I'm certain you are just trolling.
Your scenario involves someone sending coins to themselves, how am I'm trolling? Why would I send .2 to myself in order to create .3 change? What possible reason could anyone have for splitting their UTXOs to themselves?
If someone has .5 BTC they simply gain privacy on their .5 BTC without revealing any other addresses. That's how WabiSabi coinjoins work, there's no splitting required.
Now, please answer my question: Why aren't you warning users about the address reuse in Samourai's Whirlpool when recommending it to them?
You yourself linked to Samourai's disclosure and fixes, which were implemented years ago. Meanwhile Wasabi just deny their address reuse and dox anyone who talks about it.

[/quote]
So why don't you warn people about the repeated instances of Samourai's address reuse when recommending Whirlpool to people? You called it a flaw:
What is a flaw in the coinjoin protocol is when the coinjoin protocol itself actively reuses addresses
But you only mention this flaw happening in Wasabi and never in Samourai. Why aren't you capable of being honest when comparing?