That does not mean I have to agree with your interpretation.
My interpretation doesn't require your agreement to be valid. Bitcointalk.org strives to embrace a
free-speech-maximalist approach, and that's its charm -
everyone has the right to be delightfully wrong! The ban evasion rule only make sense for accounts that is in use for personal reason - when it's personal accounts.
Nope. For that to apply, moderators would have to go through the entire account history and evaluate each individual post to see if it was made for personal or business reasons. Obviously, that would be impossible.
Well, okay, let's imagine for instance that Tether comes to the forum and opens its topic to share news and answer questions. They hire one representative after another and this goes on for some time.
<...>
For this very reason, adopting such an approach to manage business presence on the forum is flawed. Right now, the forum platform doesn't have the option to create official business profiles like some other platforms do, for example Facebook. So, each account is tied to one person and should ideally be used by just that person. But that doesn't mean businesses can't have more than one representative or staff member on the forum. Each of them can maintain their own accounts and contribute to official threads or answer questions. If one of them gets banned for breaking the rules, the rest are in the clear, and the business presence remains intact.